![]() If I had to rely on either for classical, i think the Casio would be my first choice. ![]() I think again the Casio is slightly richer sounding. The "Perfect Piano" does have a realistic "harp" emulation. ![]() It seems to be slightly fuller sounding during sustain, and less "flat" sounding-I seem to hear some phase cancellation or compression in the Coakley I don't hear in the Casio but only in these middle octaves (admittedly the most important ones for most styles!) It is a major step up from the stock Ensoniq acoustic piano in the MR and after careful listening to many other digital piano online examples, is definitely still very good-it is a 16MB piano in the Ensoniq version although Coakley has created larger soundfonts more recently.Ĭompared to my Casio PX-350-almost indistinguishable in the lower and upper octaves to my ears, but the middle octaves-which always seem to be a problem with sampled pianos IMO-I give the advantage to the Casio. ![]() Still working on this-wanted to wait until I got the "Perfect Piano" expansion card for my Ensoniq MR76-to compare and post, since this is considered "historically" to be one of the better digital acoustic piano projects.Īfter my initial comparisons (hearing only, no frequency spectrum software).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |